Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 80.2 score against 79. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version. Even though the ZTE Axon 10 Pro is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's construction is lighter and thinner.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 26% greater battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rates, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.