Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having a general score of 85.3 against 76.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while ZTE Axon 10s Pro comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker device than ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a just a little higher pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little better performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor capturing lot lower quality photographs, a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max and ZTE Axon 10s Pro count with extremely similar battery performance, although the iPhone 11 Pro Max has 3969mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.