Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. IPhone 12's body is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, even though both were released only a couple months apart. The iPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 10s Pro comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
IPhone 12 has a better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 12 counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a quite better display pixels density.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Apple iPhone 12 features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.