Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-02-07 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is a lot better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's general score of 76.6. The iPhone 13 Pro construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie OS.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a brighter display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density and a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. IPhone 13 Pro has a better processing unit than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a way better (4K) video resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.