Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 88.1 score against 76.6. The iPhone X design is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it was released many years before. The iPhone X counts with a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The iPhone X has a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity. IPhone X features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a much lower image and video quality and a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.