Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 82 score against 76.6. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit inferior pixel number in each inch of screen and a way lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit faster CPU than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone XR has a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot smaller sensor which offers a much lower image and video quality, a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.