Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's global score of 76.6. Although the Google Pixel is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's construction is still lighter. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel counts with just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.