Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 general score. Google Pixel 3a's body is somewhat lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it is a little thicker and was released about 9 months before. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way larger sensor, a lot higher resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.