Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's general score of 76.6. Google Pixel 3a XL's body is just a little bit lighter than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it is a little bit thicker and was released just 9 months before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 2560x1440 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more MP.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.