Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 81.9 score against 76.6. Google Pixel 4's body is just a bit thicker but a bit lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and they were released with only 4 months difference. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro and the Google Pixel 4 count with quite similar processing units, they have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.