Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is way better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 global score. Even though Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is noticeably newer than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a better 1280 x 2800 resolution, a little bit larger display and a little bit greater display density. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit more powerful processing unit than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a really longer battery life than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 5600mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes way better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.