Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a overall score of 77 against 76.6. The HTC U Ultra is a just a little bit lighter phone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both are equally thin. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch of screen. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. ZTE Axon 10s Pro and HTC U Ultra have really similar cameras, because although the HTC U Ultra has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, a much lower resolution camera in the back and a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.