Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with an 81 score against 76.6. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so both of them should give identical OS features. The LG G7 ThinQ is a a bit lighter device than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater screen density.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a slightly better storage for apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG G7 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor which provides a much worse image and video quality and a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.