Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's overall score of 76.6. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around 20 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ's processor is very similar to the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit more storage to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors and a camera with a much worse 16 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.