Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's global score of 76.6. The Motorola One Action is a better cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, we must note that it's also just a bit heavier and thicker. Motorola One Action has just a bit better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola One Action's memory to install games and applications is just as good as ZTE Axon 10s Pro's one, both have an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and exactly the same internal storage.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and a lot higher resolution camera.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.