Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even being the best device we are comparing here, it must be told that it is also heavier and thicker.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a same size screen and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola One Hyper's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, both of them have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and the same internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper and ZTE Axon 10s Pro have very similar batteries duration. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.