Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a score of 76.6, which is slightly better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 score. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it is just a little heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView's CPU is very similar to the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same (Quad HD / 2K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.