Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10s Pro is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 76.6 score against 75.8. These phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though ZTE Axon 10s Pro and nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only a few months difference, ZTE Axon 10s Pro is thinner and somewhat lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a screen that's very similar to the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little lower pixels amount per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with greater battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures a lot better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same diafragm aperture and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.