Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with a 76.6 score against 76.2. ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Axon 10s Pro has newer 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The nubia Red Magic 5S and ZTE Axon 10s Pro both count with really similar processors, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little worse screen pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.