Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a global score of 83.8 against 76.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and ZTE Axon 10s Pro have similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A50 captures slightly better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a much tinier sensor providing a lot lower image quality, a much worse 25 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot lower 1920x1080 video definition, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy A50 has a battery life that's just as good as ZTE Axon 10s Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.