Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 76.9 against 76.6. Galaxy A70 is a a little heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has older 10 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way larger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.