Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 85.2 score against 76.6. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but both of them are equally thin. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit greater display pixel density. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A9 (2018) takes slightly better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing way worse quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.