Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 97.6 against 76.6. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both should provide the user very similar operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is notably heavier but somewhat thinner than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little better battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much tinier sensor giving a lot lower image quality and a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.