Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a general score of 98.9 against 76.6. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, we must tell that it's also somewhat heavier and just a little thicker.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit greater screen pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, both of them have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.