Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's general score of 76.6. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much smaller sensor taking way worse quality pictures and videos, a tinier aperture and a camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.