Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a better pixels density and a quite larger display.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera, a much better video resolution and a much bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.