Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-07 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Black, Ochre and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 global score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is a lot thinner and much lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera with a much better resolution, a much better video resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.