Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10s Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 76.6 score against 75.8. ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a extremely newer device, and it's also a little bit lighter and much thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active feature incredibly similar batteries duration. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.