Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's global score of 76.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a better cellphone than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it must be noted that it is also noticeably older, noticeably thicker and heavier. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S8 Active has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro and the Galaxy S8 Active both feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.