Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-07 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S9 is older and a little thicker than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is still just a little lighter. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Galaxy S9 captures clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor which gives a lot worse photo and video quality and a much less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.