Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's global score of 76.6. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is much heavier and thicker than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro and ZTE Axon 10s Pro have incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a much higher 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video quality and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better battery life than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.