Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 88.5 score against 76.6. Although the Galaxy Z Flip and ZTE Axon 10s Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Z Flip's design is just a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures slightly better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.