Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 76.6. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra design is newer than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's, but it is notably heavier and just a little bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the previous 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's processing unit is just as good as the ZTE Axon 10s Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a lot better display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a greater pixels density and a little bit bigger display.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a back-facing camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with better battery life than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.