Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-07 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 81.4 against 76.6. Both of these devices work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System). Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 10 months before.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a quite better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE captures much better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same back camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.