Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-07 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Ochre and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's overall score of 76.6. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even being the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a somewhat heavier and thicker phone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 64 MP resolution back facing camera, a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features superior battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.