Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is better than the ZTE Axon 11, with a general score of 87.1 against 76. The iPhone 8 Plus construction is just a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 11, although it is heavier and was released 3 years before. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit better processor than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 8 Plus counts with a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The iPhone 8 Plus captures a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 MP resolution and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
ZTE Axon 11 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The ZTE Axon 11 features a very superior battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 49% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.