Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than ZTE Axon 11, getting an 82 score against 76. The Apple iPhone XR design is older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than ZTE Axon 11. Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a quite smaller display and a quite lower display pixel density.
The Apple iPhone XR features a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. ZTE Axon 11 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The iPhone XR counts with a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures. The ZTE Axon 11 has longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.