Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than ZTE Axon 11, with a overall score of 84.2 against 76. The iPhone XS is an older and a little bit heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 11, but Apple was able to build it a bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS features a slightly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels per screen inch. The ZTE Axon 11 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone XS shoots a bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture. ZTE Axon 11 counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.