Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than ZTE Axon 11, getting an 87.1 score against 76. The LG Velvet design has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 11, but it's just a little heavier. LG Velvet features a display that's very similar to the display in ZTE Axon 11, because although the LG Velvet has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit larger display.
The LG Velvet's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in ZTE Axon 11, they have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The ZTE Axon 11 has just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 2 TB.
LG Velvet has a bit better battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. LG Velvet features a much better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.