Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-03-30 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than ZTE Axon 11, with a 79.2 score against 76. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and a performance increase. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is newer and thinner than ZTE Axon 11's, but it's somewhat heavier.
The ZTE Axon 11 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. ZTE Axon 11 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has superior battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.