Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than ZTE Axon 11, getting a general score of 83.8 against 76. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the ZTE Axon 11, it's design is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter. The Galaxy A50 and ZTE Axon 11 both count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 11 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 25 mega-pixels resolution and a way lower 1920x1080 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
ZTE Axon 11 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. Galaxy A50 has a battery performance that is very similar to the battery life in ZTE Axon 11.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.