Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than ZTE Axon 11, with a global score of 98.9 against 76. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device than the ZTE Axon 11. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a quite bigger display and a quite better pixels density.
The ZTE Axon 11 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a lot better video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.