Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-30 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 11, having a overall score of 83.3 against 76. Although Galaxy S9 is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than ZTE Axon 11, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The ZTE Axon 11 features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 2 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy S9 has a bit superior processing unit than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot larger aperture. ZTE Axon 11 has improved battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.