Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-30 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than ZTE Axon 11, getting an 87.9 score against 76. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is thicker and heavier than the ZTE Axon 11. These devices use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a very superior camera than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The ZTE Axon 11 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.