Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-30 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon 11's 76 general score. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 11. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has newer 11 version while ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features.
ZTE Axon 11 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 11 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The ZTE Axon 11 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos. ZTE Axon 11 has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.