Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20, having an 85.3 score against 77.8. Even being the best we are comparing, Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's design is older, just a bit thicker and heavier than the ZTE Axon 20. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a better display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 20 has a little longer battery life than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4220mAh battery size. ZTE Axon 20 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the ZTE Axon 20, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.