Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a 92.8 score against 77.8. IPhone 12 Pro is a just a bit thinner and a little lighter phone than the ZTE Axon 20, even when both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and ZTE Axon 20 counts with Android 10 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a superior hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 12 Pro features a much better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
ZTE Axon 20 captures much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The iPhone 12 Pro and ZTE Axon 20 feature very similar memory to install games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
The iPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than the ZTE Axon 20, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.