Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is much better than the ZTE Axon 20, with a score of 87.1 against 77.8. Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a notably older and a little bit heavier phone than the ZTE Axon 20, but Apple was able to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a bit faster processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The ZTE Axon 20 has a lot better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher resolution back camera.
IPhone 8 Plus features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 20, because it has more internal memory. The ZTE Axon 20 features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 57 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 8 Plus, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the ZTE Axon 20, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.