Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 score. Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older cellphone than the ZTE Axon 20, but Apple managed to build it just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The iPhone X features a bit more powerful CPU than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X features a sharper display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density and a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution. The ZTE Axon 20 has a greater camera than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. ZTE Axon 20 has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4220mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as ZTE Axon 20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get ZTE Axon 20, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.