Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than ZTE Axon 20, having an 82 score against 77.8. Apple iPhone XR's construction is a bit lighter than ZTE Axon 20, but it is a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The iPhone XR counts with a little faster processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has less CPU cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR has a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse pixels density and a way worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution. ZTE Axon 20 features a way better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Axon 20 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 has a much better battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the ZTE Axon 20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the ZTE Axon 20, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.